The recent discourse has been centered around the question of total immunity for actions taken by the President during their term, with the U.S. Supreme Court leaving the definition of “official” presidential actions to lower courts, potentially leading to prolonged legal battles.
One of the key questions raised is whether attempting to remain in office or seeking re-election can be considered an “official” presidential action or a personal one. The judicial system may take several years, if not decades, to determine this.
An example often cited is the hypothetical scenario of a president ordering the Navy Seals to assassinate a political rival. If everything a president does is now considered “official,” then the courts would have no jurisdiction, but Congress could impeach the president, and the victim’s family would not be able to sue for damages.
The sentiment that “the people get the government they deserve” has been expressed, with concerns about the state of the government starting from January 20, 2025, depending on the election results.
There have been concerns about the White House’s leadership, with some questioning whether the President is in charge and capable of making strategic decisions. Some have suggested that a group of unknown, unelected party “handlers” are making decisions for the President and the country.
There have been calls for President Joe Biden to drop out of the race for president, while no such calls have been made for former President Donald Trump, who was convicted of 34 felony charges in New York and has numerous other charges pending.
The state of New Jersey has been criticized for its current state, with issues such as high car insurance rates, poor roads, overcrowded public transportation, and high taxes being cited as reasons for wanting to leave.
The Star-Ledger/NJ.com encourages submissions of opinion and invites readers to engage in discussions on various topics.
